1) What was the biggest surprise for you in the reading? In other words, what did you read that stood out the most as different from your expectations?
What stood out to me in this week's readings is identifying problems when making ethical decisions. Ethical and moral don't always go hand in hand, and sometimes decisions are far more condensed than just doing the "right thing".
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
The venture capitalist screening criteria was a bit confusing. I see how financial projections can be based on "guesses" but is there anything tangible to support these projections? Or did I not understand the material?
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
What do you think borns those who are ethically-challenged in the entrepreneurship word? Is it as deep-rooted as their chemical make-up, or the way they were raised?
How often are financial projections met or exceeded? Are financial projections based on forecasting reliable and accurate?
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
I do not disagree with anything.
No comments:
Post a Comment